Wednesday, November 26, 2014
Saturday, June 07, 2014
http://revolution-news.com/strategic-partnerships-new-snowden-leaks-revealed-with-greenwalds-book-release/
http://revolution-news.com/strategic-partnerships-new-snowden-leaks-revealed-with-greenwalds-book-release/
Wednesday, May 21, 2014
Wednesday, May 14, 2014
Friday, May 09, 2014
http://futuristicallyancient.com/2012/10/24/the-my-stery-black-women-who-are-philosophers/
http://futuristicallyancient.com/2012/10/24/the-my-stery-black-women-who-are-philosophers/
The My-Stery: Black Women Who Are Philosophers
24OCT
2 Votes
Online PhD sent me a link to this list about female philosophers and the post generated some thoughts about the lack of attention around women in philosophy, particularly black women, leading me to a few interesting finds. Philosophy, which means “love of knowledge or wisdom,” is one of the oldest studies in human history. Afrofuturism itself can be considered a philosophy or a philosophical field, since it is a way of thinking about, feeling and engaging with the world. But often philosophy is attributed to men, especially white European men. Philosophers like Aristotle, Sophocles, Kant, and Nietzsche are constantly mentioned and praised with little criticism outside of the usual boundaries. Sometimes other cultures are mentioned in philosophy, like Chinese philosophers, Indian philosophers or a brief mention of the Egyptian Ptahotep, but other than that not much else. So, what space is there for other kinds of philosophers, including female ones of the African Diaspora.
In 2007, the Collegium of Black Women Philosophers had their first meeting to gather together women who are in the field. Later in 2011, when The Philosopher’s Eye did a post on the future of philosophy to celebrate World Philosophy Day, all of the philosopher’s included were men, showing still an uphill battle in recognition of women philosophers and philosophers of color There is already a small percentage of black philosophers, and the amount of women who are is even smaller. Below is a list of some of them:
1) Dr. Angela Davis: Although Davis is know for her political activism and afro, she also has a PhD in philosophy. Davis has done work on the philosophy and history of punishment and prisons.
2) Dr. Kathryn Gines: Gines is the founding director of Collegium of Black Woman Philosophers and has a PhD in philosophy from University of Memphis. Her areas of study include continental philosophy, Africana philosophy, philosophy of race and Black feminist philosophy. She is currently working on Black Feminism and Continental Philosophy and Hannah Arendt and the Negro Question.
3) Dr. Joyce Mitchell Cook: Cook was the first Black woman in the United States to be awarded a PhD in philosophy in 1965 at Yale. She was a managing editor of the Review of Metaphysics, has taught at Howard and worked in the White House as a writer and editor for Jimmy Carter. Her area of interest is ethics and social and political philosophy and she was working on a manuscript on the concept of the black experience.
4) Dr. Anita Allen: Allen is the first African-American woman to have both a JD and a PhD in philosophy, specializing in political and legal philosophy. In 2010, she was appointed by President Obama to the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.
5) Dr. Adrian Piper: Although she stated she does not want to be called a black philosopher, woman philosopher, or a black woman philosopher, only a philosopher, she is still going on this list (haha). Piper is a conceptual artist and analytical philosopher, receiving a PhD in philosophy from Harvard. Her work has included a study of Kant metaethics, the self and the perceptions of race, like in Cornered.
6) Dr. Jaqueline Scott: Earning a PhD in philosophy from Stanford, Scott’s interest include Nietzsche, nineteenth century philosophy, race theory, African American philosophy and Chinese philosophy. Currently, she is working on Nietzsche and African American thought and a book that is tentatively called, Nietzsche’s Worthy Opponents, Socrates, Wagner, the Ascetic Priest, and Women.
7) I could find very little on ancient African women or women from the rest of the diaspora, although I am sure they existed, but I want to mention the mother and goddess of wisdom. Sophia, which is where philosophy gets its name, is the name of a Greek name for wisdom and the goddess of wisdom. Though she is not mentioned in modern Christianity, Wisdom is known as the wife of God in Christian mysticism and pre-Christian religions. Sometimes Sophia is portrayed as a black or dark goddess representing the dark, hidden, divine feminine energy. Various goddesses of wisdom (ex. Oya, Sekhmet, Kali, Athena, Medusa) exist through many religions and some women are said to be incarnations of her, such as the Queen of Sheba.
Books, African American Philosophers, including some of the women I mentioned above, and Reframing the Practice of Philosophy: Bodies of Color, Bodies of Knowledge.
Wednesday, May 07, 2014
The Guardian UK: NSA files decoded
http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/nov/01/snowden-nsa-files-surveillance-revelations-decoded#section/2
Tuesday, May 06, 2014
http://jeremiahwright.com/2014/05/chris-hedges-capitalism-not-government-is-the-problem/
http://jeremiahwright.com/2014/05/chris-hedges-capitalism-not-government-is-the-problem/
Friday, May 02, 2014
MAYWEATHER ADMITTED TO CALL MANNY PACQUIAO AND SAID HE WAS SCARED TO LOS...
I think Mayweather is scared of Manny. None of the great champions of recent history: Ali, Foreman, Frazier, Holmes, Tyson, Sugar Ray Leonard, Hearns, Duran, Hagler, etc...they all sought out and fought their best challengers....repeatedly. Okay maybe Sugar did duck Aron Pryor a lil bit....but for the most part, these champions are great not just because of their records and titles, but because of their heart(s).
The media fawns all over Mayweather the ducker and gives him a free pass when comparing his chickenshit behavior with past greats. And since when does a boxer get to dictate who he fights next? That's new to me as well. Mayweather knows he is not the better boxer, and he needs a compliant media to distract us from that fact. Steven Smith had been a Mayweather lackey, so this video is refreshing to see one of Mayweather's flunkies finally admit that Mayweather is a dodger, and doesn't deserve to be listed among the all-time greats.
Rashard.Zanders@gmail.com
BLACKLOGIC
The media fawns all over Mayweather the ducker and gives him a free pass when comparing his chickenshit behavior with past greats. And since when does a boxer get to dictate who he fights next? That's new to me as well. Mayweather knows he is not the better boxer, and he needs a compliant media to distract us from that fact. Steven Smith had been a Mayweather lackey, so this video is refreshing to see one of Mayweather's flunkies finally admit that Mayweather is a dodger, and doesn't deserve to be listed among the all-time greats.
Rashard.Zanders@gmail.com
BLACKLOGIC
Thursday, May 01, 2014
http://gawker.com/black-people-are-cowards-1568673014
Excellent doesn't do this article justice...Homeboy Sandman hit this one outta the park. REad the comments in the original post and you can see that not many people actually read his article...rz
Black People Are Cowards
In light of the recent decision by a professional basketball team, comprised of mostly black players, to respond to their boss basically saying “I hate niggers” by turning their shirts inside out the next day at work, I have come to the decision that I agree wholeheartedly with the owner of the Los Angeles Clippers, and I too do not want black people invited to my events.
It’s not for the same reasons that the Clippers’ owner doesn’t want black people invited to his events. To be honest I don’t really know what his reasons are. Perhaps he recently tuned in to an FM “hip hop” station and after hearing song after drug, sex, and violence-laden song decided that it might be a good idea to keep some distance. Perhaps his media conditioning spans beyond music, encompassing the gamut of stereotype-enforcing media, (media championed and praised by blacks, where the most rich and famous coons are praised and idolized as examples of black “success”). Maybe he’s been hanging out with George Zimmerman, and they’ve been watching Love & Hip Hop, and Basketball Wives, and the Tyler Perry collection, and Katt Williams and Kevin Hart performances (anybody catch that Kevin Hart movie with the ex-rapper who used to have a song standing up against police brutality playing a police officer? Where Hart delivers the line that Zimmerman had no doubt heard a thousand different times in a thousand different ways, shifting his psyche to the point where he could be authentically terrified of someone just because they were black . . . “you’re white. You don’t fight.”)
No, I’m lucky enough to spend enough time with black people to recognize that we’re not the base form of human life that we continue to support ourselves being portrayed as (though admittedly, it definitely rubs off on us. A lot. So much so that it’s very puzzling to comprehend how we could blame anyone who doesn’t get to spend much time with us for fostering a wildly skewed perception. What can people know but what they see?). No, I don’t want black people to stay away from my events because I believe them to be uncivilized, or ignorant, or anything like that.
I don’t want black people at my events anymore, because black people are cowards.
In all the history I’ve ever studied, in all the fiction I’ve ever read, I am hard pressed to find an example of cowardice to rival the modern day black American, and nobody wants to be surrounded by cowards right?
What if lions break out of the zoo and start trying to eat everyone? What if aliens attack? What if the police department decides that they want to grab their batons and blow off some steam? Are cowards really the type of people that you want to be surrounded by?
Not me.
That’s why I don’t want black people at my events anymore. Athletes that could refuse to perform until a killer is arrested, even until a killer is convicted, who instead opt for taking a picture where they all have their hoods on and then carrying on with business as usual: I don’t want to be surrounded be these clowns. If you’re black, or white, and you go back to work after finding out that your boss is grossed out at the idea of being in the same vicinity with any black person except for the cutie he’s sugar daddy to, I’m pretty sure you’re not who I want in my corner during crunch time. Real crunch time. Life crunch time.
The most common excuse I’ve heard for today’s cowardice is “they need to feed their families,” which of course is a euphemism for “for the money.” You know, the blacks that sold other blacks into slavery, there’s a good chance they used some of that money to feed their families too. So, that makes them cool with all of y’all? Here’s a question, is there anything that we won’t do for money? Is getting paid an excuse for everything? It’s an excuse for looking the other way when innocent people are killed. It’s an excuse for supporting racism by trying to win a championship for an openly racist owner. With regard to hip hop and media it’s an excuse for purposefully, and most often deceitfully, representing yourself and your culture as pretty much scum who can only be validated by money. Thanks in large part to the exceptional (it’s sad just how exceptional) bravery of Michelle Alexander, (author of The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness) we live in a society where each day more and more people realize the obvious truth that the goals of the criminal justice system have way more to do with black enslavement than rehabilitation or keeping people safe. Facing the reality of modern slavery, we continue to allow ourselves to be enslaved day after day. (Granted, fear of death is a far cry from fear of lack of wealth, but they’re both fear, the currency of cowardice.) As KRS-One (whose “Sound of Da Police” was actually the theme song for the trailer of that ridiculous movie I referenced earlier, which all but brought a tear to my eye), pointed out on his classic “Black Cop,” many policemen and policewomen are now earning paychecks for gathering up their own brothers and sisters, on charges that perpetually lead to a slap on the wrist for whites but somehow manage to be the first domino in a lifetime of enslavement for blacks. These cops get to use the “feeding my family” line too. We accept it, and go about our day, meek, bullied, and afraid to assert authority against anyone but each other, and amongst each other asserting authority with a ferocity that could only be explained by the rage of hundreds of years of being bullied by everybody else. In New York City, where infiltration and displacement are referenced using the the thinly veiled insult “gentrification” (look up the root word. “Gent.” If we accept and use a term the very definition of which suggests that communities are becoming more noble and graceful, what does that say about the people being pushed out?) natives know better than to display any aggression towards white newcomers, but are as quick as ever to stare down an unfamiliar black face who isn’t from the neighborhood.
What do you call people who walk quietly to slavery? Who allow themselves to be insulted without standing up for themselves beyond wardrobe adjustments that in reality are nothing but a public show of shame? What do you call people that pretend that these ridiculous gestures actually hold some weight rather than face the fact that we are the laughing stock of the entire planet, and as long there’s the chance that someday maybe we’ll be rich there’s nothing that we’re going to do about it?
I call us cowards.
It’s almost as if people have forgotten that struggle includes struggling. You might have to lose your job. You might have to lose your life. That’s what it takes for change to happen. There’s no easy way to do this. If you’re scared to stand up for yourself, for whatever reason, all I ask is that you stop pretending. Stop with the Facebook posts. Stop with the meaningless conversations. Just stop. Be honest. About how you behave. About your part in all this madness. About what you are. A coward. Just a coward. No need to put on an act for the rest of us. We can all see right through each other.
One last thing . . .
For those of you who have made it this far without stopping for how furious at me your shame has made you, I want you to know something. I don’t really think black people are cowards. I think humans are cowards. Most of us. I think that regardless of where one’s phenotype places them within the imaginary concept of race, that the majority of us are content to live on our knees rather than die on our feet.
The problem is, we, us, black people, can’t afford to be like everyone else anymore. Not if we want to survive. I don’t know how we got here, but everywhere you look we’re at the bottom of the global totem pole. We need to make history. We can’t be cowards like every one else, not any more. In fact, we need to set a new standard for heroism. For bravery. For courage. Maybe a standard never before seen in the history of humankind. Extreme situations call for extreme measures, and in modern times our inferiority is ingrained in every single aspect of our lives, from our media, to our religion, to our science, to our public education, to our higher education, to Africa appearing to be the same size as Greenland on all of the maps despite the fact that in reality Africa is 14 times larger. It’s harder to see our enemies than it’s ever been. Our enemy isn't white people. It's people who value greed more than human life. Racial division is one of their oldest weapons, and media is their latest. We mustn’t forget how young this weapon is. I didn’t grow up using the Internet. The television itself isn’t even 100 years old. The idea of global celebrity, and global transference of ideas and perceptions of culture, has never existed the way it does today. Just as Howard Beale prophesized in Network in 1976, we’re up against “the most awesome God damned propaganda force in the whole Godless world.”
We’re going to have to step it up.
If you’re down to step it up, let’s step it up. Let’s boycott. Boycott was the foundation of the Civil Rights movement. Do you believe that a cable network exists solely to manipulate the perception of black people? Stop watching it. Don’t put up a post one day praising the episode of Boondocks that never aired and then spend the next day tweeting the entire BET awards. That doesn’t make any sense.
Let’s step it up. If every NBA player who wanted to stand up against racism vowed not to play until the Clippers’ owner resigned, it would be announced that he resigned before you were finished reading this. If he didn’t want to, someone would make him. If we boycotted every night spot that spins music about how much we love killing each other and taking and selling drugs, every single one of them would have new DJs by next week (don’t even get me started on these new DJs. The new drug dealers. Admitting that they know what they’re giving people is bad for them but caring more about getting paid). I went to DJ Spinna’s Michael Jackson/Prince party at SRBs last night and there was more dancing and mirth and free love in that place than every hip hop party in NYC in the last 10 years put together. So when people tell you that we need ratchet nonsense to dance, they’re gaming you. Don’t be so gullible. Don’t act like black people only found out how to have fun when we lost our connection to our own human decency.
Let’s step it up and not buy magazines pushing music designed to glamorize a lifestyle certain to land our youth in prison.
Let’s step it up and take off from work and stay home with our kids until these preposterous tenure rules are revoked from public schools and it’s the kids that can’t be fired, not the teachers.
Let’s step it and use social media to rally each other. Everybody knew about that woman who fired a warning shot and got 20 years (I hear she’s been released now. No thanks to us). Everybody knows about that woman who got however many years for leaving her child in the car while she went to a job interview. Every single week all over Facebook there’s a new video of someone catching a beating as bad as the one Rodney King caught, but I never see a post that says, “Share this if you’ll go on strike from work until these police officers are fired.” “Share this if you’ll strike until this woman is released.” “Share this if you won’t spend a single dollar until Troy Davis is released from death row and granted a new trial.” Can you imagine the impact that that would have? Everybody is always trying to act there’s no solutions. There are plenty of solutions. We're just too cowardly to implement them. Worried about this discomfort or that discomfort, great or small, that might take place as a result. Having to find a new place to party. Or a new show to watch. Isn’t the discomfort of oppression enough? There’s plenty of solutions, just no easy ones, but if we can shift to courage instead of cowardice, there’s more than enough solutions to guarantee our success. Guarantee. Next time you’re complaining about how this country was built on us, take a second to think about the fact that it still is. If we want to, we can shut this whole place down.
So make a decision between cowardice and courage, and if you choose courage, step it up. Step it up in any of the myriad of ways that are available to us. I’ve named a few. Name a few more. Leave a few suggestions in the comments section. Call up your friends. Tweet. Facebook.
Then start doing them. If you can’t convince anyone to do them with you, do them on your own. Start right away because we’re running out of time. I hear some states are fining people for sagging their pants. I’d never sag my pants, but if we begin to allow people to be penalized simply for attributes that we’ve allowed to be associated with being black, we’re going to find the water getting even hotter very soon.
We’ve been cowards for a very long time. We have a lot of catching up to do. Let’s start right now.
For those of you who don’t want to step it up, do me a favor and at least unfriend me.
Homeboy Sandman is a recording artist on Stones Throw Records. He previously wrote for Gawker on the topic of police brutality.
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
NAACP complicit in Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling's racism
NAACP
complicit in Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling's racism
by
Rashard Zanders, Twin Cites, MN, April 29, 2014
Note:
As
I am writing this reports have emerged online that new NBA
Commissioner Adam Silver has handed down a $2.5 million fine and more
importantly, a lifetime ban from the NBA. Kudos Commissioner Silver
for acting swiftly and decisively in your first league crisis.
Like
most fans of the NBA I too was stunned by the visceral racist rant,
first revealed by Deadspin.com, made by Donald Sterling, the
billionaire owner of the LA Clippers basketball team. Perhaps some
form of social amnesia made us forget that this person has a long and
prolific history of discrimination and racist behaviors.
However,
I was blown away to learn, that not only did the recidivist bigot
earn a LifeTime Achievement Award from the LA NAACP back in 2009, he
was on the verge, through various charitable donations to the “civil
rights” organization's youth programs, of receiving another one at
an upcoming banquet.. TWO LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS despite a long
track record of denying person's of color housing apartments he owns.
As the LA Times reported:
“Sterling
and his wife, Rochelle, agreed to pay a record settlement of $2.7
million in 2009 regarding allegations that they discriminated against
African Americans, Latinos and families with children at scores of
apartment buildings they own around Los Angeles.
“The
settlement was the largest ever obtained by the Justice Department in
a housing discrimination case involving apartment rentals, officials
said. Under the agreement, the Sterlings' insurers would pay $2.625
million to a fund for people who were allegedly harmed by their
discriminatory practices, officials said. Sterling's attorney at the
time said his client denied any wrongdoing and didn't discriminate.”
The
same article makes mention of NBA Hall of Famer Elgin Baylor's suit
discrimination suit against Sterling a few years ago:
“A
Los Angeles County Superior Court jury rejected NBA great Elgin
Baylor's termination lawsuit against the Clippers.
“Baylor
claimed he was harassed and subjected to age discrimination leading
to his 2008 departure after 22 years as a Clippers executive. When
Baylor filed the suit in February 2009, he alleged that a racist
culture existed at the Clippers. Baylor called it a "plantation
mentality" in a deposition and said that Sterling rejected a
coaching candidate, Jim Brewer,
because he was [B]lack.”
On
April 28th
I sent the following email to the NAACP's LA chapter:
“This
is addressed to anyone willing to answer a question for a freelance
writer (me) and my blog blacklogic.blogspot.com:
My question is concerning the LA NAACP's relationship with Mr. Donald
Sterling -- he of recent racist comments and the LA Clippers owner
--and how, or why, was he going to receive a lifetime achievement
award despite a long and well-documented history as a racist? As one
of the watchdogs and defenders of civil rights, I assume there is at
least some rigor and due diligence in selecting NAACP award members.
Can anyone speak on this? An email will suffice.
“That
is all I want to ask. I hope an answer is forthcoming
Yours
in the struggle,”
I
waited patiently for a response to come to my inbox. None came. Maybe
they were busy preparing their tepid excuses for helping to obscure
Sterling's bigotry while greedily gobbling up his donations. How
could such a perverse bigot as Sterling, with his record, qualify for
not one but TWO Lifetime Achievement Awards? As Luwie wrote on the
Grio.com:
“If
you are not working towards the advancement and freedom of [B]lack
people, why would you be receiving a Lifetime Achievement Award?
Donald definitely wasn’t with us shooting in the freedom gym. If
you’re going to give a white man an NAACP Lifetime Achievement
Award, he better be out on these front lines preaching equality right
next to Al and Jesse. He better be taking down the bricks of the
house of white supremacy one by one with his bare hands. He better be
doing real concrete things that are dismantling the system of racism
that his skinfolk work tirelessly to keep in place.”
Earlier
that morning while watching CNN I listened as the president of the LA
NAACP chapter, Leon Jenkins thronged by other members of his
organization address the Donald Sterling controversy and the NAACP's
relationship with him. What he blathered encapsulates one of the
unfortunate realities of groups like the NAACP – they are beholden
to money over principles of justice. Remember, this is the same
organization that shrank away from Dr. ML King Jr after his historic
Riverside Church address which addressed the criminality of poverty
and the Vietnam War, the latter being a topic many civil rights
leaders promised the government they wouldn't touch. Their
acquiescence to the deep pockets of a racist billionaire points to a
crisis of leadership within what was alleged to be the most venerable
civil rights organization in the United States. Actually my vote
would go to the Southern Poverty Law Center if I had a say.
What
the people of LA and the nation needed from that chapter of the NAACP
was dynamic leadership. It's one thing to say you won't bestow an
award, or will return donated money; but without disclosing how much
money they've actually received from him they continue to trade in
civil rights advocacy and the cause of social justice to the highest
bidder. Kinda like some auctions from the 19th
century.
What
the people got was a civil rights organization that is a shell of
it's former self.
“If
the NAACP didn’t know of Donald Sterling’s past, then they're
proving that they're incredibly out of the loop. In fact, it’ll
mean that they’re so out of the loop that they must have ended up
in a square by way of Apple Maps. And if they did
know
about his discriminatory deeds and they chose to honor him anyway
just because he dropped some coins in a bucket, then they put a price
on our people’s worth.”
Perhaps
now that the Commissioner of the NBA has dealt swiftly and decisively
against Sterling by instituting a lifetime ban against him, the
members who make up the rank and file of LA's NAACP chapter will be
motivated to critically reexamine the quality of leadership they
elected, and move just as swiftly to change it.
Rashard
Zanders is a freelance writer from Chicago currently living in the
TCs, MN. He can be reached at 872-228-4179 or via email at
rashard.zanders@gmx.com.
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Disingenuous “allies” plague Blacks' attempts to better their communities
Disingenuous “allies” plague Blacks' attempts to better their communities
By Rashard Zanders
Twin Cities, MN – April 23, 2014 – On April 18th, last Friday, a “Safety Summit” was held on Minneapolis' northside, attended by Minneapolis' Mayor Betsy Hodges, Police Chief Jan Harteau and Hennepin County Sheriff Richard Stanek among others.
It is with some cynicism that I read Minneapolis Star-Tribune writer Matt McKinney's article “Northside safety summit examines ways to fight crime in Minneapolis neighborhoods,” given the sheriff's position opposing many social justice initiatives that would significantly reduce crime. At the summit, held at the former Minneapolis Public Education building on W. Broadway Avenue on the city's northeast side.
Stanek, a former republican state legislator, said, “So often you get behind the curve and you don’t get folks like us together until there’s a polarizing incident and it’s, ‘Oh my God. Now what are we going to do?...The idea was to say ‘OK, who’s got what resources and how can we leverage them?’ ”
Given the sheriff's past love of the hated “N” word I suppose he should be applauded now for using the pronoun “us” in his quote. But what I find truly insidious, besides the fact that he was elected sheriff with large support from the city's African American leaders. Yet, away from lights, camera's and the feel good communal hug of a summit, words and deeds betray the veracity of sheriff Stanek's allegiances
According to McKinney's article, the northside of Minneapolis has seen one-third of the city's violent crime and half of it's shootings over the last 14 years. Unfortunately for the people who have to live in higher crime areas, the sheriff's actions do not match his words of allegiance in the fight against crime.
Consider his September 18, 2013 editorial, “Lax marijuana legislation is bad,” (Star-Tribune, Sept. 18, 2013)(federal anti-drug enforcement funds –good!) in the Star-Tribune on legal marijuana in the aftermath of Colorado's and Washington's legalization of the herb this year. Speaking as the sheriff and as the president of the Major Counties Sheriff's Association, Stanek bemoans that the two states' legalizing of marijuana are in opposition to federal laws which still make it illegal.
When the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a statement late last summer pledging not to challenge Washington's and Colorado's new legalization laws, Stanek felt compelled to recite what are now known to be lies and half truths about the dangers of marijuana. “As law enforcement officials with decades of experience, we know that keeping neighborhoods safe will become more difficult for our men and women on the front lines because of the DOJ’s decision.This will encourage other states to legalize marijuana,” he gloomily warned.”.
One would think that as a law enforcement official with decades of experience, he would be well informed, intuitively, that prior and current “war on drugs” offensives have not been successful, and have worked only to further entrench a cutthroat mentality and a fratricidal gangster culture among our opportunity-challenged youths.
He goes on to resurrect the oft-repeated myth that “Marijuana is an addictive gateway drug that harms Minnesota’s children and public safety in every community in our state.,” and for added measure, “”I have seen firsthand in Hennepin County that there is a direct connection between marijuana and violent crime. “
It is here that the eyes roll to the back of the head and my knees buckled.
The relationship between violent crime and marijuana is nil to negligible at best. And it is a fallacy that most visibly betrays his posture as an ally in the fight against crime. The fact is, Stanek, like so many other sheriff's departments nationwide, are addicts themselves: addicted to federal drug enforcement monies which enables the police and courts to stuff prisons and jails with non-violent marijuana offenders. He sites that “drug task forces” have made the connection between marijuana and violent crime, and that 54 percent o f violent inmates booked in Hennepin County jail tested positive for marijuana. What we are not given is what other drugs or alcohol could have shown up in test results.
Stanek also offers this unsubstantiated claim: “The DOJ announcement sends the wrong message about the dangers of marijuana, especially to youths. Scientists have concluded that it harms adolescent brains and is linked to both lower IQ scores and learning problems. More teenagers are treated for marijuana abuse than for alcohol plus all other drugs combined.
I know, it's a proverbial doozey.
He goes on to state that “Those in favor of legalizing marijuana argue that it would eliminate the criminal gangs and violence that result from illegal sales. These are false promises. There is no silver bullet that will eliminate the crime associated with marijuana sales. Governments will put restrictions on legal marijuana such as age limits and, potentially, limits on the potency of the drug. The criminal gangs will conduct illegal sales to those who want to avoid the restrictions.
Of couse, having never tried legalization, Stanek is uniquely qualified to declare it as no silver bullet against criminal activity. And simply stating that these are “false promises” doesn't make them false.
Significant reduction or maybe even the elimination, naively,of violent crime should be the goal of law enforcement, and eliminating the causes should be a part of that.
Legalization might also free courageous law enforcement agencies to go out and fight actual violent offenders, those who should be in prison: murderers, rapists, child molesters, etc. It would also free individuals in society to draft legislation going after the white collar criminals who have so destructively ravaged our economy and betrayed the working classes who make it hum.
With comments and stances against wise societal policies, and a peon's slavish devotion to a failed and tragic war on drugs, Stanek stands in direct opposition to what crime plagued communities need: Real allies capable of progressive thinking, wisdom, leadership, and a willingness to admit when a philosophy is no longer operational. The Black “leaders” who have embraced this former N word loving beat cop deserve some of the criticism as well, for again trading the needs of the communities they allege to serve for empty political access and social status.
The next time we have a crime summit in the Twin Cities, maybe members of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP) could be invited to provide the needed counterpoint residents and voters may need come next election cycle. Imagine how nice it would be to hear a Hennepin County Sheriff paraphrase something in the “Who We Are” link on the LEAP website:
“By continuing to fight the so-called “War on Drugs,” the US government has worsened these problems of society instead of alleviating them. A system of regulation and control of these substances (by the government, replacing the current system of control by the black market) would be a less harmful, less costly, more ethical, and more effective public policy. “
As recently as a few weeks ago Stanek opposed legislation that would save the lives of heroin overdose victims because he feels the priority should be on arresting the dealers over saving the life of the addict. The legislation protecting lives passed over Stanek's objections.
We should really hold our allies to a higher standard of social justice.
For further reading:
http://www.leap.cc/about/who-we-are/
http://reason.com/blog/2013/06/04/the-war-on-pot-is-both-insanely-racist-a
http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=000230
http://www.drugpolicy.org/drug-facts/10-facts-about-marijuana
http://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/marijuana-medicine
http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/20/health/marijuana-versus-alcohol/
http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/08/health/gupta-changed-mind-marijuana/
http://www.questdiagnostics.com/dms/Documents/health-trends/2013_health_trends_prescription_drug_misuse.pdf
http://www.livescience.com/24554-medical-marijuana.html
Rashard Zanders is a freelance writer currently loitering in TC cafe's. Wishes you were here. He can be reached via email at rashard.zanders @gmx.com or at 872-228-4179.
Friday, April 18, 2014
Captain America: The Winter Soldier goes where Hollywood normally fears to tread
From DISNEY no less?!?
Captain America: The Winter Soldier goes where no comic/action film has gone before. Be glad for it.
By Rashard Zanders – Twin Cities, MN
Like most comic book nerds today I am among those ecstatic with the frequency and quality of the Marvel superhero movies that have dominated the box office since the release of Iron Man I. The success of the films, including films depicting Marvel heroes Thor, the Hulk, Iron Man, Captain America and the Avengers, validates these nerds' tacit contention that the stories and characters in Marvel's lexicon a rich, layered and textured stories; character driven and action packed escapism.
Which is why I found myself even more pleasantly surprised after viewing CA: TWS. What was so surprising about the Winter Soldier is not so much how rousing an action vehicle is is, and it is surely that. What surprised was a central element of its plot and how unDisney, non-escapist, adding this plot twist is.
Spoiler here: As any fan of Marvel knows, the superhero cliques are basically managed by a shadowy government agency known as S.H.I.E.L.D, or Shield, a quasi-NSA/CIA type organization vested with defending the United States from threats galactic and terrestrial, and employing the same secrecy as it's real time counterparts.
Where the movie goes off the usual formula for a summer blockbuster (lots of action, dumbed down plots, etc) is when it dives into a very little known fact that during the end of WWII, the US, Britain, France, and Russia covertly saved the surviving nazi brain trust.
“In her new book “Operation Paperclip: The Secret Intelligence Program to Bring Nazi Scientists to America” (Little, Brown and Company), author Annie Jacobsen uses newly released documents, court transcripts, and family-held archives to give the fullest accounting yet of this endeavor — one shared by the British, the French, and the Russians, all of whom enlisted and embraced top Nazis. “ from http://nypost.com/2014/02/01/behind-the-secret-plan-to-smuggle-nazi-scientists-to-america/
This is a part of American history that will never make it into US students' history books: it doesn't mesh well with the mythology of American heroism. But there was meshing going on..particularly the meshing of the nazi braintrust with high level secret American space and military projects, such as the inception of NASA and the transition of the US intelligence apparatus from the OSS to the CIA.
In the Winter Soldier the highest ranking Shield operative is Director Alexander Pierce, played with understated creep by Robert Redford. By the end we discover that he, along with most of Shield, has been infiltrated and coopted by the movies nazi stand-ins, HYDRA, a fictional, scientific wing of the nazi party. In fact, by the end of the film, it is apparent that HYDRA has been inside of Shield since the end of WWII. Hence, most of the military and security operations executed by Shield have in reality, been at the behest of HYDRA for the last 70 plus years.
And doesn't it make sense?
The majority of US military involvement since WWII has been against nations of color; most of whom began fighting independence struggles against US and Western colonizers shortly after WWII ended. It seems democracy was an ideal to rally around for some, not all.
An objective view of US foreign policy mis-adventures, civil rights climate past and present, and an understanding of US covert actions against Third World nations struggling for self-determination, working poor struggling to make a life in the land of the free, it becomes evident that Captain America: The Winter Soldier's plot twist was really taking a page from our own history. A history that continues to forget it's past. By illuminating this cooperative relationship between Shield (CIA) and HYDRA (nazis), the movie educates its viewers in a way most Hollywood productions are afraid to: Ironic, given Walt Disney's own documented history as a nazi sympathizer.
See also:
Friday, April 11, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)